| Peer-Reviewed

System of Semantic Universals in the Sound Space Lexicon

Received: 2 February 2023     Accepted: 8 May 2023     Published: 17 May 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

One of the central problems of typological linguistics is the identification and study of common features inherent in all or most languages. All natural languages have common and distinctive regularities. The common patterns established as a result of the intersection of linguistic features in different languages by means of the comparative method are called linguistic universals. The linguistic universals established in this way in different languages of different families belong to one of the central problems of typological linguistics, to universology or linguistics of universals. The paper is a continuation of the study of absolute universals that know no exceptions or are characteristic of almost all languages of the world. The aim of the study is the system of semantic universals. Using the comparative and descriptive methods, the material of the Indo-European and Ugro-Finnish languages, representing the lexicon of the sound space of 25 languages of different language groups and families, has been traced. The languages under comparison belong to different language systems, but they have absolute universal onomatopoeic semantic formations. The reason for this typology lies in the closeness of these universals to the natural sounds of the reality, which are imitated by different language systems. In all the languages of the world, the objective basis of the studied semantic universals is extra-linguistic sound, imitation of the phenomena of sound space, because they arise in the same sphere of semantics in all languages - noise, creaking, screaming, hitting - sound in general. The formation of semantic universals is determined by two factors: extra-linguistic, or universal, independent of a particular language, and linguistic, which manifests itself in different ways depending on a particular language. The reason for this typology lies in the closeness of such semantic universals to the natural sounds of the surrounding reality, which are imitated by different language systems. Consequently, their sound shells are related to the corresponding phenomena of objective reality through their semantics. The proposed study is a contribution to the development of the theory of universals or universology as a separate science, which at this stage of linguistics development is separated from typological linguistics.

Published in International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12
Page(s) 71-77
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Typology, The System of Semantic Universals, Sound Space, Acoustic Components, Onomatopoetic, Semantic and Phonetic Motivation, Universology

References
[1] Ашмарин, Н. (1918).- Основы чувашской мимологии [Ashmarin, N. (1918). Fundamentals of Chuvash mimology. – Kazan: 120 p.]
[2] Ашмарин, Н. (1925) Подражания в языках Среднего Поволжья [J] Известия Азербайджанского университета. Общественные науки. [Ashmarin, N. (1925). Imitations in the languages of the Middle Volga region / Izvestiya Azerbaycanogo Universiteta. Social Sciences. - V. 2-3: 143-154; V. 4-5: 75-99. - Baku.]
[3] Ашмарин, Н. (1928). О морфологических категориях подражаний в чувашском языке. [Ashmarin, N. (1928). On the morphological categories of imitations in the Chuvash language. - Kazan - 160 p.]
[4] Бубрих Д. В. (1949). К проблеме изобразительной речи // Учен. зап. Карело-финского ун-та. Исторические и филологические науки. [Bubrich D. В. (1949) To the Problem of Pictorial Speech // Uchen. zap. Karelian-Finnish Univ. Historical and philological sciences. - Petrozavodsk - V. 3. - Issue. І: 85-94.]
[5] Воронин, С. В. (1968). К обоснованию объективной классификации ономатопов. Литовская республиканская конференция по вопросам германистики, романистики и классической филологии. Доклады и сообщения [Voronin S. В. (1968). To justify the objective classification of onomatopoetics. Lithuanian Republican Conference on Germanic, Romanistic, and Classical Philology. Reports and thesis. - Vilnius: 56-63.]
[6] Газиева, И. А. (2013). Семантика ономатопоэтической лексики в хинди. Проблеми зіставної семантики. [Gazieva I. A. (2013) Semantics of onomatopoetic vocabulary in Hindi. Problems of comparative semantics (J). - Issue. 2. - K.: KNLU Publishing Centre: 268-273.]
[7] Газов-Гинзберг, А. М. (1965). Был ли язык изобразителен в своих истоках? [Gazov-Ginsberg, A. M. (1965) Was language representational in its origins? - М. – 183 p.]
[8] Дмитриев, К. Н. (1962). К изучению тюркской мимологии // Дмитриев Н. К. Строй тюркских языков. [Д Dmitriev K. Н. (1962). To the Study of Turkic Mimology // N. Dmitriev. К. The structure of Turkic languages. - М: 59-84.]
[9] Звегинцев, В. А. (1964). Лингвистика универсалий. // История языкознания ХІХ – ХХ векав в очерках и извлечениях. – Ч. ІІ. М.: Просвещение. [Zvyagintsev V. A. (1964). Linguistics of Universals // History of Linguistics of the 19th-20th Centuries in Essays and Extracts. – Part II. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye: 378-382.]
[10] Корди, Е. Е. (1965). Значение, образование и употребление междометий в французском языке: Автореф. дис… кандидата филол. наук. Л. [Kordy E. Е. (1965). The Meaning, Formation and Use of Interjections in French: Ph. Ph.D. thesis in Philology - L: 19 p.]
[11] Корнилов, Г. Е. (1984). Имитативы в чувашском языке. – Чебоксары. [Kornilov G. E. (1984) Imitatives in the Chuvash language. - Cheboksary: 183.]
[12] Косов, В. Т. (1963). Междометия современного немецкого языка как особый разряд слов: Автореф. дис.... кандидата филол. наук. М. [Kosow V. Т. (1963) Interjections of the Modern German Language as a Special Category of Words: Ph. Candidate of Philological Sciences. - M.: 30 p.]
[13] Ладченко, М. М., Юсип - Якимович, Ю. В. (2010). Verba dicendi: німецько-слов’янські лексичні паралелі // Сучасні дослідження з іноземної філології. Збірник наукових праць. Випуск 8. Відп. ред. Фабіан М. П. – Ужгород: ТОВ „Папірус-Ф“. [Ladchenko M. M., Yusyp - Yakymovych Y. V. (2010). Verba dicendi: Germanic-Slavic lexical parallels // Modern studies in foreign philology. Collection of scientific papers. Issue 8. Responsible ed. Fabian M. P. - Uzhhorod: LLC "Papyrus-F": 296-304.]
[14] Ладченко, М. М., Юсип-Якимович, Ю. В. (2014). - Cлов’яно-германські семантичні універсалії в галузі ономатопоетики. Studia slovakistica 15. [Ladchenko M. M., Yusyp-Yakymovych Y. V. (2014). Slavic-Germanic semantic universals in the field of onomatopoetics // Studia slovakistica 15, Uzhhorod: 92-103.]
[15] Лапкина, Л. З. (1979). Английские и башкирские акустические ономатопы (опыт типологического исследования). [Lapkina L. Z. (1979) English and Bashkir acoustic onomatopoeia (typological research): Ph.D. in Philology: 19 p.]
[16] Лурье С. Я. (1955). Неизменяемые слова в функции сказуемого в индоевропейских языках. [Lurye S. Y. (1955). Unchangeable words in the function of the predicate in the Indo-European languages. - Lviv: Publishing house of Lviv University: 71 p.]
[17] Рамстедт, Г. (1957). Введение в алтайское языкознание [Ramstedt G. (1957) An Introduction to Altai Linguistics. - М: 254.]
[18] Скаличка, В. (1967). Исследование венгерских звукоподражательных выражений Пражский лингвистический кружок. [Skalichka V. (1967). A study of Hungarian sound-similar expressions // The Prague Linguistic Circle. - Moscow: Nauka: 277- 316.]
[19] Смаль-Стоцький, Р. (1929). Примітивний словотвір. [Smal-Stotski R. (1929). Primitive word formation. - Warszawa: 200.]
[20] Толстая, С. М. (1971). Фонетические наблюдения над ономатопеическими образованиями с суффиксом -ot- в верхнелужицком языке. Исследования по славянскому языкознанию [Tolstaya S. М. (1971). Phonetic observations on onomatopoeic formations with the suffix -ot- in Upper Sorbian. Studies in Slavic linguistics. - Moscow: Nauka: 272-280.]
[21] Ульманн, С. (1970). Семантические универсалии. Новое в лингвистике 5. Языковые универсалии [Ullmann S. (1970) Semantic universals. New in Linguistics. - Issue. 5. Linguistic universals. - Moscow: Progress: 250-293.]
[22] Хакулинен, Л. (1955). Развитие и структура финского языка. – Ч. 2. [Hakulinen L. (1955) The development and structure of the Finnish language. - PART 2. - M: 292.]
[23] Чиронов, С. В. (2004). Ономатопоэтические слова в современном японском языке (Проблемы функционирования). [Chirnonov S. V. (2004) Onomatopoetic words in the modern Japanese language (Problems of functioning): Ph.D. in Philology, M.]
[24] Юсип–Якимович, Ю. В. (1998). Ономатопея як абсолютна та семантична мовна універсалія. [Yusyp - Yakymovych Y. V. (1998) Onomatopoeia as an absolute and semantic language universal // Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University: Philology. - No. 3 – Uzhhorod: 40-46.]
[25] Юсип–Якимович Ю. В. (2007). Ономатопоетика українських говорів Карпат: семантична, фонетична, словотвірна структура та похідність ономатопів [Yusyp-Yakymovych Y. V. (2007). Onomatopoetics of Ukrainian dialects of the Carpathians: semantic, phonetic, word-formation structure and derivation of onomatopoeia: Uzhhorod: Grazhda: 268.]
[26] Якобсон, Р. 1965. Значение лингвистических универсалий для языкознания. Перевод В. В. Шеворошкина. Звегинцев В. А. История языкознания ХІХ – ХХ веков в очерках и извлечениях. [Yakobson R. (1965). Significance of linguistic universals for linguistics. Translation by V. V. Shevoroshkin. // Zvegintsev V. A. History of linguistics in the 19th - 20th centuries in essays and extracts. –M.]
[27] Bilfeldt, Н. Н. (1982). Onomatopoetica im Sörbischen und Deutschen // Zeitschrift für Slavistik. – N 3. – S. 323-331.
[28] Bilfeldt, Н. Н. (1986). Ономатопоэтика в серболужицком и немецком // IX Международный съезд славистов. – Киев, сентябрь, 1983 / Материалы дискуссии. Языкознание // Onomatopoetics in Serbian Lusatian and German // IX International Congress of Slavists. - Kyiv, September, 1983 / Proceedings of the conference. Linguistics. – K. Naukova Dumka: 217-222.
[29] Bittner, М. (1912). Die onomatopoetische Verba der Türkischen. – Wiener z. f. d. Kunde 2. Morgenlanges. – Bd. 26. – S. 263-269.
[30] Boranič, D. (1909). Onomatopejske riječi za životinjе u slavenskim jezicima. – Rad Jugoslavenske Akademije Znanosti і Umjetnosti. − CL XXVIII. – Zagreb. – S. 1-86.
[31] Diego, V. (1965) de. Etimologías naturales. – Revista de dialectología у tradiciones populares. – Vol. 20. N 1/2. – P. 3-39.
[32] Grammont, M. 1901. Onomatopées et mots expressifa // Revue des langues romanes. – Vol. 44. − N 1. – P. 97-158.
[33] Graur, A. 1953. Contribuţii la studiul raportului dintre forma şi continutul ouvintelor // Studii şi cercetări lingvistice. - Vol. 4. – P. 89-97.
[34] Hilmer, H. 1914. Schallnachahmung Wortschöpfung und Bedeutungswandel. – Halle. – 356 s.
[35] Iordan, I. (1962). Lingvistica romanica (Evolutie. Curente. Metode). – Bucureşti: 439 p.
[36] Kořínek, J. (1934). Studie z oblastí onomatopoje. – Praha: 296.
[37] Kopečný, F. (1957). Slavistický příspĕvek k problemu t. zv. elementární příbuznosti // ЕзиковедскиизследваниявчестнаакадемикСтефанМладенов. – София: 363-387.
[38] Ladtschenko, M. (2011). Onomatopoetische Verben des Sprechens in der deutschen Umgangssprache // Germanistik in der Ukraine. Jahrheft 6’. – K., 2011: 109-112.
[39] Leskien, A. (1903). Schallnachahmung und Schallverba in Litauischen // Indogermanische Forschungen. – Bd. 13: 165-212.
[40] Machek, V. (1930). Studie o tvoření vyrazů expresivních. – Praha: 156.
[41] Malmberg, B. (1963). Struktural Linguistics and Human Communication. – Berlin: 210.
[42] Mirambel, A. (1959) Lа langue greсque moderne. – Paris: 473.
[43] Ramstedt, G. (1951). Über onomatopoetische Wörter in den altaischen Sprachen. (J). Soc Finno-ougrienne. N 55: 106-112.
[44] Sommer, F. (1933). Lautnachahmung // Indogermanischen Forschungen. – Bd. 51: 229-268.
[45] Schwentner E. (1924). Die primären Interjektionen in den indogermanischen Sprachen. – Heidelberg: 68.
[46] Spitzer, L. (1928). Stilstudien. – München. – Bd. 1: S. 85-100.
[47] Wittoch, B. (1958). Onomatopee romineşti on-ng-/-no- // Melanges linguistigues offerts a Emil Petrovici Cercetări de linguistica III. – Supliment: 548-559.
[48] Wundt, W. (1900). Völkerpsychologie. Die Sprache. – Leipzig.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yuliia Yusyp-Yakymovych, Oksana Shovak. (2023). System of Semantic Universals in the Sound Space Lexicon. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 11(3), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yuliia Yusyp-Yakymovych; Oksana Shovak. System of Semantic Universals in the Sound Space Lexicon. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2023, 11(3), 71-77. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yuliia Yusyp-Yakymovych, Oksana Shovak. System of Semantic Universals in the Sound Space Lexicon. Int J Lang Linguist. 2023;11(3):71-77. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12,
      author = {Yuliia Yusyp-Yakymovych and Oksana Shovak},
      title = {System of Semantic Universals in the Sound Space Lexicon},
      journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {71-77},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20231103.12},
      abstract = {One of the central problems of typological linguistics is the identification and study of common features inherent in all or most languages. All natural languages have common and distinctive regularities. The common patterns established as a result of the intersection of linguistic features in different languages by means of the comparative method are called linguistic universals. The linguistic universals established in this way in different languages of different families belong to one of the central problems of typological linguistics, to universology or linguistics of universals. The paper is a continuation of the study of absolute universals that know no exceptions or are characteristic of almost all languages of the world. The aim of the study is the system of semantic universals. Using the comparative and descriptive methods, the material of the Indo-European and Ugro-Finnish languages, representing the lexicon of the sound space of 25 languages of different language groups and families, has been traced. The languages under comparison belong to different language systems, but they have absolute universal onomatopoeic semantic formations. The reason for this typology lies in the closeness of these universals to the natural sounds of the reality, which are imitated by different language systems. In all the languages of the world, the objective basis of the studied semantic universals is extra-linguistic sound, imitation of the phenomena of sound space, because they arise in the same sphere of semantics in all languages - noise, creaking, screaming, hitting - sound in general. The formation of semantic universals is determined by two factors: extra-linguistic, or universal, independent of a particular language, and linguistic, which manifests itself in different ways depending on a particular language. The reason for this typology lies in the closeness of such semantic universals to the natural sounds of the surrounding reality, which are imitated by different language systems. Consequently, their sound shells are related to the corresponding phenomena of objective reality through their semantics. The proposed study is a contribution to the development of the theory of universals or universology as a separate science, which at this stage of linguistics development is separated from typological linguistics.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - System of Semantic Universals in the Sound Space Lexicon
    AU  - Yuliia Yusyp-Yakymovych
    AU  - Oksana Shovak
    Y1  - 2023/05/17
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12
    T2  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JF  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    JO  - International Journal of Language and Linguistics
    SP  - 71
    EP  - 77
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-0221
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231103.12
    AB  - One of the central problems of typological linguistics is the identification and study of common features inherent in all or most languages. All natural languages have common and distinctive regularities. The common patterns established as a result of the intersection of linguistic features in different languages by means of the comparative method are called linguistic universals. The linguistic universals established in this way in different languages of different families belong to one of the central problems of typological linguistics, to universology or linguistics of universals. The paper is a continuation of the study of absolute universals that know no exceptions or are characteristic of almost all languages of the world. The aim of the study is the system of semantic universals. Using the comparative and descriptive methods, the material of the Indo-European and Ugro-Finnish languages, representing the lexicon of the sound space of 25 languages of different language groups and families, has been traced. The languages under comparison belong to different language systems, but they have absolute universal onomatopoeic semantic formations. The reason for this typology lies in the closeness of these universals to the natural sounds of the reality, which are imitated by different language systems. In all the languages of the world, the objective basis of the studied semantic universals is extra-linguistic sound, imitation of the phenomena of sound space, because they arise in the same sphere of semantics in all languages - noise, creaking, screaming, hitting - sound in general. The formation of semantic universals is determined by two factors: extra-linguistic, or universal, independent of a particular language, and linguistic, which manifests itself in different ways depending on a particular language. The reason for this typology lies in the closeness of such semantic universals to the natural sounds of the surrounding reality, which are imitated by different language systems. Consequently, their sound shells are related to the corresponding phenomena of objective reality through their semantics. The proposed study is a contribution to the development of the theory of universals or universology as a separate science, which at this stage of linguistics development is separated from typological linguistics.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Slavic Philology, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine

  • Department of English Philology, Uzhhorod National University, Uzhhorod, Ukraine

  • Sections