Chinese “de” plays the role of connecting the modifier and modified element in nominal structures. Different viewpoints about “de” have been argued from the perspective syntax in the literature. However, none of them presents a satisfactory explanation up to now. To solve this problem, we propose, “de” is a functional category with the feature [Nom]. Under contextual phase theory, with the existence of “de”, there is the corresponding projection “DeP”; and without “de”, there is only the projection of NP or ClassifierP and no DeP. This proposal can be illustrated with ellipsis phenomenon and left branch extraction phenomenon in Chinese. In DeP structures, the whole DeP or the complement of DeP can be elided. This is in accordance with ellipsis theory, under which only phase or the complement of phase can be elided. In DeP structures, only the Spec of DeP can be extracted and moved. This is in accordance with left branch extraction requirement, under which only the Spec of phase can be extracted and moved following the rule of successive movement, PIC and anti-locality. The different “de” structures are analyzed one by one from the perspective of ellipsis phenomenon or left branch extraction. Our viewpoint of DeP can explain more “de” structures in Mandarin Chinese.
| Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 13, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11 |
| Page(s) | 65-75 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Chinese “de”, DeP, Ellipsis, Left Branch Extraction
| [1] | Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding. Phd. Diss., University of Connecticut dissertation. |
| [2] | Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. Phd. Diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
| [3] | Aoun, Joseph & Audrey Y-H. Li. 2008. Ellipsis and missing objects. In Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, eds. Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta. 251–274. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
| [4] | Belletti, Adriana. 1988. The case of unaccusatives. Linguitic Inquiry 1: 1-34. |
| [5] | Bošković, Željko. 2008. What will you have, DP or NP? Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 37: 101-114. |
| [6] | Bošković, Željko. 2012. On NPs and Clauses. In Discourse and grammar: From sentence types to lexical categories, eds. Günther Grewendorf, Thomas Ede Zimmermann, 179-242. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. |
| [7] | Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27-89. |
| [8] | Bošković, Željko. 2015. From Complex NP constraint to everything: On deep extractions across categories. The Linguistic Review (GLOW issue) 32: 603-669. |
| [9] | Bošković, Željko & Chris Hsieh. 2013. On word order, binding relations, and plurality in Chinese noun phrases Studies. Studies in Polish Linguistics 8: 173-204. |
| [10] | Chao, Yuanren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press. |
| [11] | Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MA.: MIT Press. |
| [12] | Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1-52. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. |
| [13] | Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational issues in generative grammar, eds. Robert Freidin, Carllos Otero, Marira Zubizarreta, 33-166. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press. |
| [14] | Despić, Miloje. 2011. Syntax in the absence of determiner phrase. Phd. Diss., University of Connecticut dissertation. |
| [15] | Dikken, Marcel den. 2007. Phase Extension Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1-41. |
| [16] | Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. |
| [17] | Han, Jingquan. 2000. A study of possessor raising movement in relation to case theory. Modern Foreign Languages 3: 261-272. |
| [18] | He, Yuanjian & Lingling Wang. 2007. On Nominalization in Chinese. Chinese Language Learning 2: 13-24. |
| [19] | Huang, C.-T. James, 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Phd. Diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
| [20] | Huang, C.-T. James., Li. Y.-H. Audrey & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [21] | Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21-35. |
| [22] | Kitagawa, Chisato & Claudia Ross. 1982. Prenominal modification in Chinese and Japanese. Linguistic Analysis 9: 199-153. |
| [23] | Li, Yenhui. Audrey. 1998. Argument determiner phrases and number phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 693-702. |
| [24] | Lobeck, Anne. 1990. Functional heads as proper governors. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 20: 348-362. |
| [25] | Lu, Jianming. 2003. A new approach to analysis of Chinese “NP De VP”. Chinese Language 5: 387-391. |
| [26] | Ning, Chunyan. 1996. De as a functional head in Chinese. Working papers in Linguistics. University of California‚ Irvine. |
| [27] | Perlmutter, David. 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. UC Berkeley, 157–189. |
| [28] | Rouveret, Alain. 2012. VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 897-963. |
| [29] | Saito, Mamoru & Keiko Murasugi. 1990. N’-deletion in Japanese. University of Connecticut Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 87-107. |
| [30] | Saito, Mamoru, Jonah Lin &Keiko Murasugi. 2008. N’-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 247-271. |
| [31] | Si, Fuzhen. 2002. The Chinese complementizer “De” and the related syntactic problems. Language Teaching and Research 2: 35-40. |
| [32] | Si, Fuzhen. 2004. Head theory and DeP in Chinese. Contemporary Linguistics 1: 26-34. |
| [33] | Simpson, Andrew. 2001. Definiteness agreement and the Chinese DP. Language and Linguistics 2: 125-156. |
| [34] | Takahashi, Masahiko & Kenshi Funakoshi. 2013. On PP Left-Branch Extraction in Japanese. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19: 237-246. |
| [35] | Tsutsumi, Hirokazu. 2021. Notes on some interpretive aspects of the Left-Branch Extraction in Japanese. Phd. Diss., Tohoku University. |
| [36] | Tang, C-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’ theory. Phd. Diss., Cornell University. |
| [37] | Wang, Shilong. 2014. Analyzing Chinese VP ellipsis under Bošković’s phase theory. Modern Foreign Languages 37: 773-782. |
| [38] | Wang, Shilong. 2016. Analyzing left branch extraction in Chinese noun phrases under phase theory. Modern Foreign Languages 39: 627-637. |
| [39] | Watanabe, Akira. 2010. Notes on nominal ellipsis and the nature of no and classifiers in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19: 61-74. |
| [40] | Wu, Gang. 2000. The syntax of DeP in Chinese. Modern Foreign Languages 1: 1-12. |
| [41] | Xiong, Zhongru. 2005. A DP Structure headed by De. Contemporary Linguistics 2: 148-165. |
| [42] | Xu, Jie. 1999. Some theoretical issues of two types of Chinese retained-Objects constructions. Contemporary Linguistics 1: 16-29. |
| [43] | Zhang, Nianwu. 2006. Syntactic analysis of De phrases. Foreign Language Research 2: 71-76. |
| [44] | Zhu, Dexi. 1982. The lecture notes of grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press. |
APA Style
Wang, S. (2025). Analyzing Chinese “de” Under Contextual Phase Theory. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 13(2), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11
ACS Style
Wang, S. Analyzing Chinese “de” Under Contextual Phase Theory. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2025, 13(2), 65-75. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11,
author = {Shilong Wang},
title = {Analyzing Chinese “de” Under Contextual Phase Theory
},
journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics},
volume = {13},
number = {2},
pages = {65-75},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20251302.11},
abstract = {Chinese “de” plays the role of connecting the modifier and modified element in nominal structures. Different viewpoints about “de” have been argued from the perspective syntax in the literature. However, none of them presents a satisfactory explanation up to now. To solve this problem, we propose, “de” is a functional category with the feature [Nom]. Under contextual phase theory, with the existence of “de”, there is the corresponding projection “DeP”; and without “de”, there is only the projection of NP or ClassifierP and no DeP. This proposal can be illustrated with ellipsis phenomenon and left branch extraction phenomenon in Chinese. In DeP structures, the whole DeP or the complement of DeP can be elided. This is in accordance with ellipsis theory, under which only phase or the complement of phase can be elided. In DeP structures, only the Spec of DeP can be extracted and moved. This is in accordance with left branch extraction requirement, under which only the Spec of phase can be extracted and moved following the rule of successive movement, PIC and anti-locality. The different “de” structures are analyzed one by one from the perspective of ellipsis phenomenon or left branch extraction. Our viewpoint of DeP can explain more “de” structures in Mandarin Chinese.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Analyzing Chinese “de” Under Contextual Phase Theory AU - Shilong Wang Y1 - 2025/03/06 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 65 EP - 75 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20251302.11 AB - Chinese “de” plays the role of connecting the modifier and modified element in nominal structures. Different viewpoints about “de” have been argued from the perspective syntax in the literature. However, none of them presents a satisfactory explanation up to now. To solve this problem, we propose, “de” is a functional category with the feature [Nom]. Under contextual phase theory, with the existence of “de”, there is the corresponding projection “DeP”; and without “de”, there is only the projection of NP or ClassifierP and no DeP. This proposal can be illustrated with ellipsis phenomenon and left branch extraction phenomenon in Chinese. In DeP structures, the whole DeP or the complement of DeP can be elided. This is in accordance with ellipsis theory, under which only phase or the complement of phase can be elided. In DeP structures, only the Spec of DeP can be extracted and moved. This is in accordance with left branch extraction requirement, under which only the Spec of phase can be extracted and moved following the rule of successive movement, PIC and anti-locality. The different “de” structures are analyzed one by one from the perspective of ellipsis phenomenon or left branch extraction. Our viewpoint of DeP can explain more “de” structures in Mandarin Chinese. VL - 13 IS - 2 ER -
School of Foreign Studies, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
